EU RoHS Directive 2005/618 as a supplementary document / EC has already provided the six hazardous substances maximum allowable concentration, so why does it need another draft "of electronic information products in a limited amount of toxic and hazardous substances requirements" (hereinafter referred to as "limited request") the industry standard? What similarities and differences between them?
Original position: "limited request" for supporting domestic "Electronic Information Products Pollution Control Management Measures" (hereinafter referred to as "management") and the implementation of the development, and its limited requirements in a uniform material for the units of measurement, and the European Union 2005 / 618/EC provisions concentration limits are identical, but "limited request" also provides two other components of electronic and information products (measurement) modules: metal plating and small parts (4 mm3). In both cases are prevalent in the electronic and information products, testing if the authority or control checks on all uniform materials to measure or set limits do not have operable. If the products meet the EU 2005/618 / EC limits on certain provisions to meet AC motor capacitor the "limited request" requirements, and the contrary is not, but the probability is not high contradictions.
Original position 40 Q: What is meant by "intentionally added (hazardous material)?" Of a company's products were found in the coating of harmful substances above set standards, and the company is indeed no intention, whether the company should not be punished?
Original position: "limited request" to "add interest" has been clearly defined, and the introduction of "intentionally added," the concept is difficult to resolve in accordance with the metal coating evenly split testing or material to a matter of judgement, but because his "intention" or "inadvertently" in the actual operation can not be judge, cited the "electronic and information products in toxic and hazardous substances detection method" Discrimination based on objective standards. Under normal circumstances, they do not wish to use or add coating of harmful substances is not usually fell. To avoid a small number of people "have no intention" as a pretext, if found use of harmful substances, it must be punished.
Original location 41: metal coating is a homogeneous material, why should they be composed of separate modules?
Original location: Under normal circumstances, the metal coating is a single homogeneous materials, but these materials is not easy method by mechanical separation and isolation and access to the substrate, which is the main element of taking into account the actual operations (Supervision and Inspection ) may encounter problems.
Original position 42, and asked: Why should the "small parts or materials (less than or equal to 4 mm3)," as an electronic information products in the composition of a basic unit (EIP-C)? 4mm3 how come from?
Original position: As electronic information products in a large number of small parts, these AC motor capacitor parts are often composed of many kinds of uniform material (EIP-A) component, in most practical cases, these small mechanical parts not passed Resolution The method of separation was homogeneous materials of this unit are the main consideration to the actual operations (Supervision and Inspection) may encounter problems. Taking into account EIP-A test of the outcome of consistency through the large number of theoretical analysis and experimental research, the division by 4 mm3 standards. The main principle is: 1) the size of the impact of separation of the most critical factors as quality or area, if too small or too little can be classified by the number of sample solution; 2) to further split evenly and not demolition materials will be at the same conclusions (qualified or not), but the specific content of the number is not important. For example, suppose a capacitor pin plating is Tiqianhanliao (37% Pb), in accordance with regulatory requirements, which is obviously not up to standards, testing can not split, if not the overall split of its lead content As the capacitor will not lead other parts of the actual test results become smaller, but if not smaller than the 0.1%, it can also be an unqualified conclusion. This approach can not only remove unnecessary transition and not a split, saving time and costs, but also to be split evenly with the material after testing the same conclusion.
Original position 43, asked: "limited request" mentioned in the "detection unit" is not electronic and information products is the composition of units?
Original position: in fact, using different names are the main consideration to the use AC motor capacitor of convenience. "Component unit" is in contrast to the electronic and information products, and implementation of the testing time is usually the use of "detection unit." Standard also provides a "test unit" must "component unit", so that the results can control limits and requirements in order to judge whether or not a qualified.
Original location 44: electronic information products unit composed of hundreds, if not a failure of the product does not meet the requirements of the standard? Too harsh?
Original location Answer: Yes, as long as a component unit (EIP-A/B/C) failure of the product does not meet the standard requirements. In the EU's RoHS Directive limits the requirement is that such control can be achieved on the one hand, the aim of using harmful substances, and the other hand was able to do that with the international practice.
Original position 45, asked: "limited request" Why should EIP-A/B/C formed by the order of units classified?
Original position: "limited request" electronic and information products will be an AC motor capacitor essential element to the classification, the limit set by the respective methods. EIP-B / C classification unit composed mainly to supervise the implementation is to consider the feasibility and workability, and the front of the EIP-A supplementation, therefore, it is necessary to regulate this type or sort order.